Disagreement: A broader perspective

This kind of debate is seriously not required. At a time when there is intense xenophobia and paranoia, this thing puts us back in time. Geert Wilders, a dutch MP, has directed a film called Fitna, which means strife. It showcases the negativity of Islamization, and how Islam is a threat to freedom.

Now, putting it in a lay man's outlook, it could be intriguing. The protests over the Prophet Mohammad cartoons may force people to think that Muslims are against freedom of expression. The backdrop of terrorism and the conservative outlook of the muslims may make people suppress any moderate views that they may have. The problem with 'Fitna' is that this ensures the stereotype more concretely.

One has to only look at the film to realize that the whole scenario is placed out of context. This is a clear sign of Xenophobia, and the misconception of freedom of expression. Fundamental freedom of expression states that demonizing a particular religion or a group of people is illegal. But, unfortunately, this exposes the loophole called Freedom of expression.

The west has always fallen into the trap of xenophobia. The problem is that the verses in the Koran are easily placed out of context. The multiple interpretations of religious texts leads to conflict within societies. Jihad is one of the most misinterpreted terms, and it will continue to be misinterpreted by nationalists and xenophobists as long as the war on terror remains.

The Muslim community must stand up, so that this film can be commonly disagreed on. The community is facing isolation and misunderstanding on an everyday basis. If they have to usher in a new era, then they can begin by rejecting not only this film, but all the Jihadists and people like Bin-Laden, who are bringing constant damage to the Koran.